apb
07-20 07:54 PM
The date on the bulletin states July/20 (today's date) and no where it states that this is only for June filers. Am I missing something here
wallpaper Best Friends
santa123
10-01 08:35 PM
what is the purpose of this thread? :mad:
mantric
07-22 04:48 AM
is this already covered by these polls -
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6266
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6128
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1671
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6266
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6128
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1671
2011 funny poems for friends. funny
ABC of GC
04-03 01:50 PM
Thank you,
more...
r1977maharjan
10-08 08:06 AM
In our 485 notices, Under the section, it is stated as Unknown. priority date is blank. Please let me know if anyone is facing similar situation and what needs to be done to correct it?
Please give some input
Thanks
Please give some input
Thanks
mr_rajeevsaxena
06-26 09:48 AM
Hello Everyone,
We are currently evaluating our options of starting a business on EAD, which should be coming within 3 months of filing of I485 in July. Does anyone know if I or my wife can start a business on EAD, are there any issues with it?
Thanks
We are currently evaluating our options of starting a business on EAD, which should be coming within 3 months of filing of I485 in July. Does anyone know if I or my wife can start a business on EAD, are there any issues with it?
Thanks
more...
waitnwatch
09-11 11:13 AM
Two questions for the experts...
I am on J1 visa and have received a home residency requirement waiver. Do the experts here know if I can apply for a J1 visa extension (after receiving the waiver)? I read somewhere that it may not be possible to do so.
Also, are there are any foreign travel restriction on a J-1 visa?
Thanks
Getting a waiver implies that you want to change your status. So renewal may not be a good idea. I would talk to a lawyer about the implications.
I am on J1 visa and have received a home residency requirement waiver. Do the experts here know if I can apply for a J1 visa extension (after receiving the waiver)? I read somewhere that it may not be possible to do so.
Also, are there are any foreign travel restriction on a J-1 visa?
Thanks
Getting a waiver implies that you want to change your status. So renewal may not be a good idea. I would talk to a lawyer about the implications.
2010 hot funny poems for friends.
wandmaker
11-29 11:38 AM
Thank for your reply
As I interpret what you said If she comes back on H4 her H1 (i797) invalidates?
Yes, she can not work until she files another h4-h1 (cos) - you will not be subject to cap, you can do that any time after she enters.
As I interpret what you said If she comes back on H4 her H1 (i797) invalidates?
Yes, she can not work until she files another h4-h1 (cos) - you will not be subject to cap, you can do that any time after she enters.
more...
maximus777
06-08 11:12 AM
Whatever maybe the motivation, but I hope there are enough politicians like him who depend on immigrant votebanks to push for CIR. Not sure, CIR even if passed would do any good EB. :rolleyes:
hair funny best friend poems.
thomachan72
07-14 02:02 PM
Hi Guys,
A quick one. I have a HIb visa which is expiring on 9th of next month . I have never worked for that employer as things did'nt work out. I am currently in Australia and want to work as a contractor in US. I have already figured out who is going to transfer/sponsor my new H1.
I am pretty sure that my employer would have cancelled my h1 which was allotted to me in 2007 quota.
I have a tourist visa as well and i intend to goto US on that Visa and work out on the transfer of my H1 once i land there.
Can i really do the above or am i getting too optimistic.
Please reply soon as i have to make some really quick decisions.
Regards
N
your old H1 would not be of any use/issue for you. Apply for a new one with the new employer and it would be an easy process. Transfering basically means applying for a new one. The employer has to go through all the processes (advert, recruitment, LC etc). I have no idea about converting from B1 to H1.
A quick one. I have a HIb visa which is expiring on 9th of next month . I have never worked for that employer as things did'nt work out. I am currently in Australia and want to work as a contractor in US. I have already figured out who is going to transfer/sponsor my new H1.
I am pretty sure that my employer would have cancelled my h1 which was allotted to me in 2007 quota.
I have a tourist visa as well and i intend to goto US on that Visa and work out on the transfer of my H1 once i land there.
Can i really do the above or am i getting too optimistic.
Please reply soon as i have to make some really quick decisions.
Regards
N
your old H1 would not be of any use/issue for you. Apply for a new one with the new employer and it would be an easy process. Transfering basically means applying for a new one. The employer has to go through all the processes (advert, recruitment, LC etc). I have no idea about converting from B1 to H1.
more...
eagerr2i
11-10 06:07 PM
You can find noraties always at the nearest "Mailboxes Etc".. in the town; they are pricey though at $ 10 per attestation, else you should check your legal department in your work place.
hot house house funny poems for
SGP
12-22 05:58 AM
Hi,
Need quick suggestion:
Company A filed for GC. Labor and I-140 was approved. I-485 was filed during July 2007.
I changed employer in June 2009; replied to RFE and filed AC21 in July 2009.
I came to know that my GC sponsring company is going to close the company soon. My current immigration attorney is suggesting that if that happens; and if INS came to know that GC sponsring company is closing down, they will revoke my I-140.
Is it true? I thought after AC21 is invoked; whatever happens to GC sponsring company, it will not impact my GC application in any way.
Please advice.
V
Your I140 cannot be canceled/revoked unless USCIS detects that it was obtained fraudulently.
Your GC application will not be impacted. Just find another employer and join them with EAD.
Need quick suggestion:
Company A filed for GC. Labor and I-140 was approved. I-485 was filed during July 2007.
I changed employer in June 2009; replied to RFE and filed AC21 in July 2009.
I came to know that my GC sponsring company is going to close the company soon. My current immigration attorney is suggesting that if that happens; and if INS came to know that GC sponsring company is closing down, they will revoke my I-140.
Is it true? I thought after AC21 is invoked; whatever happens to GC sponsring company, it will not impact my GC application in any way.
Please advice.
V
Your I140 cannot be canceled/revoked unless USCIS detects that it was obtained fraudulently.
Your GC application will not be impacted. Just find another employer and join them with EAD.
more...
house funny poems for friends. funny
ronhira
03-22 06:40 PM
tom friedman doesn't know about the details of this issue..... for him immigration means more h1b visa..... he doesn't have a clue @ gc mess...... there r others who have done research on this subject.... but those studies did not get as much attention.... maybe others need to come up with a shape... lets pick one.... lets say "earth is rhombus".... and then publish these reports... that might help catch some attention....
Source - http://www.nfap.com/pdf/071206study.pdf
"THE CHILDREN OF H-1B VISA HOLDERS
At the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search, the nation’s premiere science competition for top high school students, the National Foundation for American Policy conducted interviews to determine the immigration background of the 40 finalists. The results: two-thirds of the Intel Science Talent Search finalists were the children of immigrants. And even though new H-1B visa holders each year represent only 0.03 percent of the U.S. population, it turns out more of the children had parents who entered the country on H-1B visas than had parents born in the United States. In other words, if critics had their way, many of the coming generation’s top scientists and engineers would not be here in the United States today – because we never would have allowed in their parents."
Source - http://www.nfap.com/pdf/071206study.pdf
"THE CHILDREN OF H-1B VISA HOLDERS
At the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search, the nation’s premiere science competition for top high school students, the National Foundation for American Policy conducted interviews to determine the immigration background of the 40 finalists. The results: two-thirds of the Intel Science Talent Search finalists were the children of immigrants. And even though new H-1B visa holders each year represent only 0.03 percent of the U.S. population, it turns out more of the children had parents who entered the country on H-1B visas than had parents born in the United States. In other words, if critics had their way, many of the coming generation’s top scientists and engineers would not be here in the United States today – because we never would have allowed in their parents."
tattoo i miss you friend poems
nhgc
03-12 12:40 PM
I140 pending under EB3, non premium category with receipt date 2/1/07.
I have worked for my current company for 6 years. Currently in the 7th year of H-1B with 1 year extension until March 08.
I want to change jobs due to dissatisfaction with current work, and also due to possible future restructuring within company.
How can I change companies without having to go back or live overseas for 1 year and start the process all over again?
Thanks,
I have worked for my current company for 6 years. Currently in the 7th year of H-1B with 1 year extension until March 08.
I want to change jobs due to dissatisfaction with current work, and also due to possible future restructuring within company.
How can I change companies without having to go back or live overseas for 1 year and start the process all over again?
Thanks,
more...
pictures 2010 funny poems for friends.
gc_hanged
01-05 06:22 AM
After The Fall: Making Sense Out Of Sensenbrenner by Gary Endelman (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2006,0104-endelman.shtm#bio)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
dresses funny poems for friends. funny
nirenjoshi
08-03 05:14 PM
Hi Spider,
Sorry, I dont know the answer to your question about resending the EAD..
But, could you tell me if your EAD renewal was filed electronically or on paper?
Thanks and all the best,
Sorry, I dont know the answer to your question about resending the EAD..
But, could you tell me if your EAD renewal was filed electronically or on paper?
Thanks and all the best,
more...
makeup Friendship poems are near
RNGC
03-06 06:40 PM
The thread is having very less visibility....post this in all forums...
girlfriend funny valentine poems.
sanprabhu
07-27 05:48 PM
I am not sure if non-citizen, non-PR person can contribute to the campaign's of the federal office candidates.
hairstyles funny poems for friends. funny
sargon
01-11 08:10 AM
Hi,
Myself and my wife filed our I-485 applications a couple of years ago. My wife was supposed to fill the date of birth of her mother in the application form. My month-in-law was born in a village about sixty five years ago, and nobody is aware of her precise date of birth. So we filled a date that was the most probable date as per our best judgment.
We forgot about the matter till now. However recently my folks back in India got a passport made for my mother-in-law. In the passport they filled a different date of birth (same year, different day and month). I came to know of this issue when we were planning to obtain a visitor visa for my mother-in-law.
How will this issue impact our pending I-485 applications, and the chances of my mother-in-law obtaining a US visa. It was a genuine mistake with no ulterior motives whatsoever. However now the lady has two different DOB in two different set of documents (her passport and her daughter's I-485 application). Should we take any steps to rectify the matter, or just ignore it.
Thanks all.
Myself and my wife filed our I-485 applications a couple of years ago. My wife was supposed to fill the date of birth of her mother in the application form. My month-in-law was born in a village about sixty five years ago, and nobody is aware of her precise date of birth. So we filled a date that was the most probable date as per our best judgment.
We forgot about the matter till now. However recently my folks back in India got a passport made for my mother-in-law. In the passport they filled a different date of birth (same year, different day and month). I came to know of this issue when we were planning to obtain a visitor visa for my mother-in-law.
How will this issue impact our pending I-485 applications, and the chances of my mother-in-law obtaining a US visa. It was a genuine mistake with no ulterior motives whatsoever. However now the lady has two different DOB in two different set of documents (her passport and her daughter's I-485 application). Should we take any steps to rectify the matter, or just ignore it.
Thanks all.
Blog Feeds
02-05 06:40 PM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/PPT%20Control.pngWith all our experience counseling on immigration law questions, the attorneys at Fong & Chun in Los Angeles do not regularly get the chance to see the day-in, day-out operations at airports and other ports of entry.
Whether it is Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy or not, I do not know, but last week, I noticed DHS personnel roaming through the terminals at Dulles International Airport in Washington, DC. They actually went to various gates and randomly requested ID or passports from OUTBOUND passengers seated in the boarding areas.
That is, they checked the documents of both Americans and foreigners who were LEAVING the USA. Not entering.
I followed them around a little bit. The officers were friendly, civil. They approached passengers in the terminal, asked them their final destinations, and asked if they could see their passports. Interestingly, although I was standing right next to a bank of chairs in the boarding area, they did not ask me for my passport, nor did they ask anyone who was standing or walking through the terminal. They only approached persons seated in the departure gate area. I did not see them detain anyone.
I have often been asked whether DHS personnel made random checks of persons in airports. I used to say that "they could, but I've never seen it." Well, I have now. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/01/dhs-roams-airport-terminals-re.html)
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/PPT%20Control.pngWith all our experience counseling on immigration law questions, the attorneys at Fong & Chun in Los Angeles do not regularly get the chance to see the day-in, day-out operations at airports and other ports of entry.
Whether it is Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy or not, I do not know, but last week, I noticed DHS personnel roaming through the terminals at Dulles International Airport in Washington, DC. They actually went to various gates and randomly requested ID or passports from OUTBOUND passengers seated in the boarding areas.
That is, they checked the documents of both Americans and foreigners who were LEAVING the USA. Not entering.
I followed them around a little bit. The officers were friendly, civil. They approached passengers in the terminal, asked them their final destinations, and asked if they could see their passports. Interestingly, although I was standing right next to a bank of chairs in the boarding area, they did not ask me for my passport, nor did they ask anyone who was standing or walking through the terminal. They only approached persons seated in the departure gate area. I did not see them detain anyone.
I have often been asked whether DHS personnel made random checks of persons in airports. I used to say that "they could, but I've never seen it." Well, I have now. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/01/dhs-roams-airport-terminals-re.html)
jayleno
07-23 10:46 PM
Thanks for the post. I did a search and I got some results. Looking at the results and the name of the site I felt there is a typo in the name.
It should have been stalejobs.com instead of scalejobs.com. If you are remotely associated with the site here is my disclaimer:
I'm not a judge so please do not take my judgement seriously. No offense nor pun is intended in my post.
I came across a good job website and it looks like lot of interesting features than todays job sites.
www.scalejobs.com
It should have been stalejobs.com instead of scalejobs.com. If you are remotely associated with the site here is my disclaimer:
I'm not a judge so please do not take my judgement seriously. No offense nor pun is intended in my post.
I came across a good job website and it looks like lot of interesting features than todays job sites.
www.scalejobs.com
No comments:
Post a Comment